Introduction
· Shankracharya was a Nambudari Brahmin born in
Malabar(Kaladi) in early 8th century CE.
· Persecute by Jainism he took a triumphant visit
to north India, where he worsted his opponents in debates.
Philosophy
· Knowledge: God and created are one, and differences were not
real but apparent and arose due to ignorance.
· Salvation: The way to salvation is devotion to God(bhakti), strengthened by the
knowledge that the God and created are same.
· How to Achieve Salvation: At the deepest level of meditation (’निर्विकल्प
समाधि’) the complete identity
between God and created is realized and all the suffering of life ceases and
that state is called (सच्चिदान्द ब्राह्मण).
Efforts and Impact
How did
Sankaracharya seek to integrate the different religions cults in India?
Contemporary
Conditions: At this time, the expression of Hinduism
which is sourced from the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta of Upanishad was under
threat.
1.
Different
Sects: A multitude of sects,
each adhering to different scriptural interpretations had arisen
2.
Mimansa: Reliance on elaborate rituals of Mimansa
school had become a common practice.
3.
Band J:
In addition Buddhism and
Jainism had become quite strong.
Writing: He wrote extensive commentaries on Upanishad,
Brahma Sutra and Gita.
· Consistent System in Upanishad: By able use of logical argument and figurative
interpretation of some phrases he reduced all the self-contradictory argument
of the Upanishads to a consistent system.
· Shanmata system: This not only revitalized the philosophical system
but also united different sects into a common framework
of Shanmata system.
· Framework: This framework advocated that various Hindu paths were all valid ways
of approaching the supreme non-duality and the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta
stood over and above all the other forms of Hinduism and encapsulated them.
Tour: In addition to this voluminous writings the
other strategy he adopted to integrate different sects was to tour the Indian
subcontinent. On tour he would meet religious personalities of different
schools, engage them in debate and win over them to Advaita Vedanta. He took
three such tours of India.
Disciple Scholars: Adi Shankara had a number of disciple scholars during his travels, who
authored their own literature on Shankara and Advaita Vedanta and led to
further integration.
Monasteries: Another step which led to integration of
different sects was the founding of monastic centers (matha), with each matha
having its own Shankracharya chosen from amongst his closest disciples. These
mathas were set up at cardinal points of the country(4- Jagannathpuri,
Shringeri, Dwarka and Badrinath) and resulted in the whole of sub-continent
linked with teachers of Advaita Vedanta. These institutes led to physical and
spiritual unification of the country.
Other Efforts and Impact
·
Influence on different It was
only after Shankara that the theologians of the various sects of Hinduism utilized
Vedanta philosophy to a greater or lesser degree to form the basis of their
doctrines, while the Nath-tradition established by him, led "its
theoretical influence upon the whole of Indian society became final and
definitive”.
·
Difference between Buddhism
and Jainism: He also explained the key difference
between Hinduism and Buddhism, stating that Hinduism asserts "Atman (Soul,
Self) exists", while Buddhism asserts that there is "no Soul, no
Self".
·
Challenge
to Buddhism and Jainism: He
posed the most serious challenge to Buddhism and Jainism after he reformulated
the Hindu philosophy.
·
Importance of Monastic Life: He established the importance of monastic life as sanctioned in the
Upanishads and Brahma Sutra, in a time when the Mīmāṃsā school established
strict ritualism and ridiculed monasticism. He is reputed to have founded four mathas
("monasteries").
· Panchayatana: He introduced the Pañcāyatana form of worship, the simultaneous worship
of five deities – Ganesha, Surya, Vishnu, Shiva and Devi. Shankara explained
that all deities were but different forms of the one Brahman, the invisible
Supreme Being.
Criticism
The path of knowledge put forward by him
could be understood by few and thus could not influence the masses.
No comments:
Post a Comment